~The Red Menace~

Radical Feminist, Anarcha-Socialist, Lezbian Queer Dyke Cunt Lover, Secular Humanist, Activist Social Change Agent, Mestiza-Classed, Community Builder, RED MENACE!!


I'm a Public Leader, Community Organizer, and Community Builder. And I'm also an Anarcha-Socialist who fights to eliminate capitalism and other political, social, and economic hierarchies to create a society without institutions where all people have equal access to knowledge and production, emphasizes trade unions and decentralized methods of direct democracy, and finds any institutional form to be abusive. And I'm a Radical Feminist who believes the cause of women's oppression to be within patriarchy and the cause of all oppression to be in the mimicked hierarchical structures such as capitalism and amerikkkanism and globalism and colonialism and imperialism and jesusgodism which means society needs to be recreated and not changed cuz change just rearranges the same shit in a different order. And I'm a Secular Humanist who believes we got ourselves into this mess and can only rely on ourselves to get the hell out. And I'm Mestiza-Classed: the educated working-class wonder! And a Lezbian Queer Dyke Cunt Lover. An active activist social change agent iconoclastic catalyst. A VOICE with capital letters that stand tall and out and above and are heard and seen...always an outspoken mouth on the pretty face of the strong head of an independent woman. I'm an individual within the collective. And a Revolution! I'm a ReVoLuTiOn! and revolutionizer. A riotous redhead. THE Red Menace!





Sunday, March 7, 2010

Words4Thought 2: Feminism v Human Rights

Most people would probably say that feminism is the belief in equality between men and women. I strongly disagree with that. Feminism is bigger. The recognition of systemic oppression – the realization that sexism, racism, heterosexism, classism stem from the same source and intersect in way that makes them inseparable – is key here. Feminism is the philosophy that systemic oppression distributes power unequally amongst all people, not just between men and women, and that it must be re-distributed so that all people have equal power and equal access. Equality is fundamental here – but it’s bigger than men and women. The power of feminism is bigger than recognizing that the personal is political and creating an equal distribution of power because it can mean so many things for different people. Feminism, in being a philosophy, can be more than an identity or social change for some people; it can be a life-style, a political ideology, a social ideology, a spirituality, maybe even a form of therapy.

Though some people would say that this definition of feminism lends itself to human rights and therefore, all people would be feminists, I would again have to disagree with that. First, not all people would be feminists because there are some people who benefit from this unequal distribution of power and therefore, they would not want power to be distributed equally among all people. Second, while feminism and human rights are similar and often overlap and compliment each other, they are different. Human rights has a global connotation – it’s an international movement. And in the U.S., global seems to mean everywhere but the U.S. So with human rights, there is a connotation of lifting all other societies to match the civilization and progress of the U.S. The U.S. has a lot of work to do, so it shouldn’t be the standard, but that is what has happened to the concept of human rights. Because of that, it seems that human rights has unintentionally developed its own unequal distribution of power, and that is anti-feminist in my book. This is not to say all human rights missions or activists are anti-feminist – far from it, in fact; this is just to say that the philosophies and sub-conscious motives are.

Moral of the story:  stop using Human Rights as a substitute for the F word; they are different and feminism isn't going any place.

No comments:

Post a Comment